Best AI Development Services Europe

HYS Enterprise vs Markovate: full comparison for 2026

Quick verdict

HYS Enterprise (4.0/5) edges ahead of Markovate (3.9/5) overall. HYS Enterprise is the better choice for EU clients wanting both headquarters and delivery fully inside the EU. Markovate is the stronger option for US founders wanting an AI-only product partner. The right choice depends on your project size, budget, and required tech stack.

HYS Enterprise vs Markovate: head-to-head summary

Criterion HYS Enterprise Markovate
Founded 2007 2015
HQ Amsterdam, Netherlands San Francisco, United States
Team size 213 51-200
Rating 4.0 / 5 3.9 / 5
Primary differentiator Both legal HQ (Netherlands) and delivery hub (Poland) sit fully inside EU jurisdiction AI-exclusive focus dating to 2015, based entirely in the US
Pricing model Fixed project or dedicated team Fixed project or dedicated team
Min. engagement Not disclosed Not disclosed
Primary tech stack Python, AWS, Azure Python, PyTorch, OpenAI API
Industries served Fintech, Healthcare, Retail & e-commerce Fintech, Healthcare, Retail & e-commerce, Logistics

HYS Enterprise vs Markovate: overview

HYS Enterprise

HYS Enterprise was founded in 2007 and is headquartered in Amsterdam, Netherlands, an EU member state, with its main development hub staffed by engineers based in Poland, also within the EU. As of mid-2026 the company reported 213 employees. Both its legal headquarters and primary delivery hub sit inside EU jurisdiction, a combination fewer vendors on this list can claim, with AI delivered as an extension of its general consulting and engineering practice.

Markovate

Markovate has run as an AI-only agency out of San Francisco since 2015, with a team in the 51-200 range under co-founder Rajeev Sharma. Its decade of case studies has stayed centered on generative AI and machine learning product work, entirely from a US base with no reported European delivery presence.

Services and capabilities: HYS Enterprise vs Markovate

Capability HYS Enterprise Markovate
Generative AI
Machine learning
AI agents
MLOps
AI consulting
Fixed-price projects
Dedicated team model

Tech stack comparison: HYS Enterprise vs Markovate

Framework / platform HYS Enterprise Markovate
Python
AWS
Azure N/A
OpenAI API N/A
TensorFlow N/A N/A
PyTorch N/A
Kubernetes N/A N/A

Pricing comparison: HYS Enterprise vs Markovate

Criterion HYS Enterprise Markovate
Minimum engagement Not disclosed Not disclosed
Engagement models Fixed project, Dedicated team Fixed project, Dedicated team
Rate transparency Not public Not public
Price tier Mid-market Mid-market

Target audience comparison: HYS Enterprise vs Markovate

Dimension HYS Enterprise Markovate
Best company size Startup to mid-market Startup to mid-market
Best industries Fintech, Healthcare, Retail & e-commerce Fintech, Healthcare, Retail & e-commerce
Best use cases Getting fully EU-based contracting and delivery in one vendor relationship., Running a general IT consulting engagement that includes an AI component within EU jurisdiction. Turning a generative AI concept into a shipped product with a small, senior US-based team., Getting a fast generative AI prototype built before deciding on an in-house hire.
Typical project type Fixed project Fixed project

HYS Enterprise vs Markovate: pros and cons

HYS Enterprise
+ Amsterdam headquarters and Poland delivery hub both sit fully inside the EU.
+ Nearly two decades of IT consulting experience.
+ Consistent, precisely reported headcount (213) rather than a wide estimated range.
+ Simplifies EU-based contracting and data residency conversations for clients wary of offshore layers.
- AI is delivered as an extension of general IT consulting rather than a dedicated practice
- Smaller team than most enterprise-scale firms on this list, limiting very large program capacity
Markovate
+ Ten years of AI-only positioning predates most competitors' generative AI pivot.
+ Based in San Francisco, close to the model providers it integrates most often.
+ Willing to take direct founder calls rather than routing through account management layers.
+ Case studies describe shipped generative AI products rather than proof-of-concept demos.
- No reported European office or delivery presence
- Team size limits how many large concurrent engagements the agency can realistically run

Who should choose HYS Enterprise?

A typical fit: getting fully EU-based contracting and delivery in one vendor relationship.

Both legal HQ (Netherlands) and delivery hub (Poland) sit fully inside EU jurisdiction. Minimum engagement is not publicly disclosed. Works best with clients in Fintech, Healthcare, Retail & e-commerce.

Who should choose Markovate?

A typical fit: turning a generative AI concept into a shipped product with a small, senior US-based team.

AI-exclusive focus dating to 2015, based entirely in the US. Minimum engagement is not publicly disclosed. Works best with clients in Fintech, Healthcare, Retail & e-commerce, Logistics.

Decision matrix: HYS Enterprise vs Markovate

Your situation Recommended choice
You need full-ownership delivery on a defined project scope HYS Enterprise
You need a large dedicated team for an ongoing programme HYS Enterprise
Your budget is at the lower end Compare: HYS Enterprise (Not disclosed) vs Markovate (Not disclosed)
You need specialist depth in a specific vertical Markovate
You need staff augmentation or team extension Neither; consider alternatives that offer staff aug
You need consulting before committing to a build HYS Enterprise

Use case fit: HYS Enterprise vs Markovate

Use case HYS Enterprise fit Markovate fit Winner
Getting fully EU-based contracting and delivery in one vendor relationship. Strong Strong Both equally
Running a general IT consulting engagement that includes an AI component within EU jurisdiction. Strong Limited HYS Enterprise
Turning a generative AI concept into a shipped product with a small, senior US-based team. Limited Strong Markovate
Getting a fast generative AI prototype built before deciding on an in-house hire. Strong Strong Both equally
Fixed-price build Limited Limited Both equally
Staff augmentation Limited Limited Both equally

Verdict: HYS Enterprise vs Markovate

HYS Enterprise (4.0/5) is the stronger overall choice for most AI Development projects. Both legal HQ (Netherlands) and delivery hub (Poland) sit fully inside EU jurisdiction.

Markovate (3.9/5) is worth a look if you need getting a fast generative AI prototype built before deciding on an in-house hire. If your situation matches that, Markovate is a competitive option.

Related comparisons

HYS Enterprise vs Markovate FAQ

Is HYS Enterprise better than Markovate?

HYS Enterprise (4.0/5) scores higher overall, but "better" depends on your use case. HYS Enterprise's strongest advantage: amsterdam headquarters and Poland delivery hub both sit fully inside the EU. Markovate's strongest advantage: ten years of AI-only positioning predates most competitors' generative AI pivot.

How do HYS Enterprise and Markovate differ in pricing?

HYS Enterprise uses fixed project or dedicated team pricing. Markovate uses fixed project or dedicated team pricing. Neither firm publishes a full rate card; a discovery call is required for project-specific quotes.

Which is better for enterprise: HYS Enterprise or Markovate?

Markovate is the larger team and typically the better enterprise-scale choice. For very large programmes, verify team size and compliance coverage directly with each company before shortlisting.

What are the main differences between HYS Enterprise and Markovate?

HYS Enterprise's primary differentiator is: both legal HQ (Netherlands) and delivery hub (Poland) sit fully inside EU jurisdiction. Markovate's primary differentiator is: AI-exclusive focus dating to 2015, based entirely in the US. They also differ in team size (213 vs 51-200), minimum engagement (Not disclosed vs Not disclosed), and primary industries served (Fintech, Healthcare vs Fintech, Healthcare).

Verify all details directly with each company before making a decision.